City Planning Commission


CLICK for Slideshow Summaries

Planning for the City of Toronto needs expert, independent oversight. The activities of City Planning Staff must be directed and reviewed by an expert, independent, professional body, whose mandate is protection of the public interest.

Politicians are not experts in planning matters, and are subjected to continuous “lobbying” by parties whose primary interest is profits. This exposes the public interest to potential corruption, together with incompetent planning and a failure of good governance for the residents of the City of Toronto.

The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal constitutes a failed, unfair, outdated component of the City planning process, which favours moneyed Parties, who purchase the services of lawyers and planners. The decisions of a single Adjudicator can only be over-turned by Divisional Court, another costly venue.  LPAT ‘litigation’ constitutes a serious barrier for the public, and represents an unnecessary, expensive and undemocratic process that is not in the public interest.

City and Provincial governments exist for one purpose only: to manage and protect public assets and the public interest.

Residents are always the primary stakeholders.

Unfortunately, the situation presently exists where residents are expected to pay taxes BUT otherwise be ignored by Municipal and Provincial Governments.

Governments that accommodate only “special interest groups” or their “personal” interests and opinions, or “pet projects” are failing their mandate to fairly manage and protect the public interest – the “public” incudes all residents, not just a few.

Comparison with New York City Planning Commission

85 years of history and experience in City Planning

Toronto is the 4th largest city in North America with more than 2.7 million residents, while New York City is the 2nd largest city in North America with more than 8.6 million residents.

In 1936, 85 years ago, New York City established a City Planning Commission to provide the structure for comprehensive planning in New York City, replacing a haphazard planning and zoning system that functioned principally through the interaction of interest groups and political forces (which is what we currently have for Toronto). For the first time New York had a professional agency with a single purpose: to serve the people of New York by planning for the entire city.

On an annual basis, approximately 450-500 planning applications are reviewed by the CPC within five months (150 days), with direct input from residents through their Community Boards, and no appeal of CPC decisions, which are final.

While in Toronto developers can continue to appeal to LPAT, it is highly unlikely that LPAT will hear an appeal of a decision made by a 9-member panel of planning experts appointed by City Council.

Click on the following links for:

1. Failure of the LPAT system when compared with Good Governance objectives.
2. A summary of how a new City of Toronto Planning Commission will interact with City Planning, City Council and residents – similar to the operations of the NY CPC.
3. Draft legislation for a City of Toronto Planning Commission for inclusion in the City of Toronto Municipal code.
4. Download the FULL REPORT for a City of Toronto Planning Commission to supersede LPAT decisions for Toronto.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at: